STRATAHELM · COMMUNITY AI EXPOSURE & RESILIENCE INDEX

North Dakota — AI workforce exposure by county

CAERI National › North Dakota · 53 counties

Every one of North Dakota's 53 counties is scored on the Community AI Exposure & Resilience Index, built entirely from public federal data. Click any county — on the map or in the table — for its full profile. County pages carry a neutral, data-only fiscal summary; a researched state-specific fiscal analysis is part of the subscription.

Counties by national percentile band

Adams — CAERI 18.8 (Bottom 25%, national)Barnes — CAERI 51.9 (50th–75th, national)Benson — CAERI 45.2 (25th–50th, national)Billings — CAERI 47.1 (25th–50th, national)Bottineau — CAERI 22.8 (Bottom 25%, national)Bowman — CAERI 25.5 (Bottom 25%, national)Burke — CAERI 29.9 (Bottom 25%, national)Burleigh — CAERI 47.5 (25th–50th, national)Cass — CAERI 45.6 (25th–50th, national)Cavalier — CAERI 50.0 (50th–75th, national)Dickey — CAERI 34.6 (Bottom 25%, national)Divide — CAERI 52.1 (50th–75th, national)Dunn — CAERI 38.0 (Bottom 25%, national)Eddy — CAERI 42.0 (Bottom 25%, national)Emmons — CAERI 32.4 (Bottom 25%, national)Foster — CAERI 43.6 (25th–50th, national)Golden Valley — CAERI 32.9 (Bottom 25%, national)Grand Forks — CAERI 43.5 (25th–50th, national)Grant — CAERI 40.8 (Bottom 25%, national)Griggs — CAERI 35.4 (Bottom 25%, national)Hettinger — CAERI 41.1 (Bottom 25%, national)Kidder — CAERI 40.2 (Bottom 25%, national)LaMoure — CAERI 49.5 (25th–50th, national)Logan — CAERI 42.8 (25th–50th, national)McHenry — CAERI 38.1 (Bottom 25%, national)McIntosh — CAERI 43.3 (25th–50th, national)McKenzie — CAERI 39.1 (Bottom 25%, national)McLean — CAERI 34.5 (Bottom 25%, national)Mercer — CAERI 41.6 (Bottom 25%, national)Morton — CAERI 37.2 (Bottom 25%, national)Mountrail — CAERI 31.4 (Bottom 25%, national)Nelson — CAERI 50.6 (50th–75th, national)Oliver — CAERI 49.0 (25th–50th, national)Pembina — CAERI 42.4 (Bottom 25%, national)Pierce — CAERI 33.5 (Bottom 25%, national)Ramsey — CAERI 43.4 (25th–50th, national)Ransom — CAERI 39.7 (Bottom 25%, national)Renville — CAERI 44.9 (25th–50th, national)Richland — CAERI 30.9 (Bottom 25%, national)Rolette — CAERI 35.1 (Bottom 25%, national)Sargent — CAERI 25.0 (Bottom 25%, national)Sheridan — CAERI 28.3 (Bottom 25%, national)Sioux — CAERI 40.8 (Bottom 25%, national)Slope — CAERI 30.8 (Bottom 25%, national)Stark — CAERI 35.3 (Bottom 25%, national)Steele — CAERI 39.8 (Bottom 25%, national)Stutsman — CAERI 44.4 (25th–50th, national)Towner — CAERI 49.7 (25th–50th, national)Traill — CAERI 46.4 (25th–50th, national)Walsh — CAERI 40.2 (Bottom 25%, national)Ward — CAERI 34.2 (Bottom 25%, national)Wells — CAERI 54.2 (50th–75th, national)Williams — CAERI 55.3 (50th–75th, national)
Top 10%75th–90th50th–75th25th–50thBottom 25%
Shaded by national percentile band — relative standing among all U.S. counties, not a condition. Grey = not scored (no general-purpose county government).
US rankCounty / equivalent CAERINat'l band State rankConfidence
978 Williams 55.3 50th–75th 7High
1095 Wells 54.2 50th–75th 1Medium
1300 Divide 52.1 50th–75th 4Low
1322 Barnes 51.9 50th–75th 3Medium
1471 Nelson 50.6 50th–75th 11Low
1547 Cavalier 50.0 50th–75th 6Low
1577 Towner 49.7 25th–50th 5Low
1604 LaMoure 49.5 25th–50th 9Low
1654 Oliver 49.0 25th–50th 16Low
1816 Burleigh 47.5 25th–50th 2High
1858 Billings 47.1 25th–50th 13Low
1932 Traill 46.4 25th–50th 14Medium
2025 Cass 45.6 25th–50th 8High
2075 Benson 45.2 25th–50th 10Low
2115 Renville 44.9 25th–50th 17Low
2162 Stutsman 44.4 25th–50th 15Medium
2251 Foster 43.6 25th–50th 19Low
2253 Grand Forks 43.5 25th–50th 12High
2266 Ramsey 43.4 25th–50th 18Medium
2275 McIntosh 43.3 25th–50th 24Low
2330 Logan 42.8 25th–50th 20Low
2368 Pembina 42.4 Bottom 25% 23Low
2403 Eddy 42.0 Bottom 25% 26Low
2438 Mercer 41.6 Bottom 25% 34Medium
2491 Hettinger 41.1 Bottom 25% 33Low
2519 Sioux 40.8 Bottom 25% 25Low
2521 Grant 40.8 Bottom 25% 21Low
2559 Kidder 40.2 Bottom 25% 27Low
2563 Walsh 40.2 Bottom 25% 35Medium
2599 Steele 39.8 Bottom 25% 37Low
2602 Ransom 39.7 Bottom 25% 22Low
2653 McKenzie 39.1 Bottom 25% 29Medium
2746 McHenry 38.1 Bottom 25% 30Low
2747 Dunn 38.0 Bottom 25% 31Medium
2797 Morton 37.2 Bottom 25% 28High
2909 Griggs 35.4 Bottom 25% 45Low
2919 Stark 35.3 Bottom 25% 32High
2927 Rolette 35.1 Bottom 25% 41Low
2955 Dickey 34.6 Bottom 25% 36Low
2961 McLean 34.5 Bottom 25% 40Medium
2972 Ward 34.2 Bottom 25% 38High
3004 Pierce 33.5 Bottom 25% 43Medium
3033 Golden Valley 32.9 Bottom 25% 48Low
3046 Emmons 32.4 Bottom 25% 39Low
3075 Mountrail 31.4 Bottom 25% 44Medium
3089 Richland 30.9 Bottom 25% 42Medium
3092 Slope 30.8 Bottom 25% 51Medium
3105 Burke 29.9 Bottom 25% 46Low
3123 Sheridan 28.3 Bottom 25% 49Low
3135 Bowman 25.5 Bottom 25% 50Medium
3137 Sargent 25.0 Bottom 25% 47Medium
3139 Bottineau 22.8 Bottom 25% 52Medium
3142 Adams 18.8 Bottom 25% 53Low
Want the full dashboard? City-level detail, trend monitoring, and peer benchmarking are part of the CAERI subscription. Request access.